Paper detail

Statistical strong lensing. III. Inferences with complete samples of lenses

Context. Existing samples of strong lenses have been assembled by giving priority to sample size, at the cost of having a complex selection function. With the advent of the next generation of wide-field photometric surveys, however, it might become possible to identify subsets of the lens population with well-defined selection criteria, trading sample size for completeness. Aims. There are two main advantages of working with a complete sample of lenses. First, it is possible to recover the properties of the general population of galaxies, of which strong lenses are a biased subset. Second, the relative number of lenses and non-detections can be used to further constrain models of galaxy structure. This work illustrates how to carry out a statistical strong lensing analysis that takes advantage of these features. Methods. I introduced a general formalism for the statistical analysis of a sample of strong lenses with known selection function, then tested it on simulated data. The simulation consists of a population of $10^5$ galaxies with an axisymmetric power-law density profile, a population of background point sources, and a subset of $\sim10^3$ strong lenses, complete above an observational cut. Mandatory. The method allows to recover the distribution in Einstein radius and mass density slope of the galaxy population in an unbiased way. The number of non-lenses helps to constrain the model when magnification data are not available. Conclusions. Complete samples of lenses are a powerful asset to turn precise strong lensing measurements into accurate statements on the properties of the general galaxy population.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.