Paper detail

Statistical Shapes of the Highest Pulses in Gamma--Ray Bursts

The statistical shapes of the highest pulse have been studied by aligned method. A wavelet package analysis technique and a developed pulse--finding algorithm have been applied to select the highest pulse from burst profiles observed by BATSE on board CGRO from 1991 April 21 to 1999 January 26. The results of this work show that the statistical shapes of the highest pulses are related to energy: the higher the energy, the narrower the pulse. However, the characteristic structures of the pulses have nothing to do with energy, which strongly supports the previous conclusion that the temporal profiles in different channels are self--similar. The characteristic structures of the pulses can be well described by a model proposed by Norris et al. (1996). The fitting parameters are: $t_r$=0.12, $t_d$=0.16, $\upsilon =1.09$, the ratio of $t_r$ to $t_d$ for the pulse is 0.75. The result leads to our conjecture that the mechanisms of bursts in different gamma-ray bands might be the same. The shock, either an internal or an external one, producing the pulse, might emit photons over the four energy channels in the same way.

preprint2002arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.