Paper detail

Statistical predictions for the first black holes

The recent observations of supermassive black holes (SMBHs) at high redshift challenge our understanding of their formation and growth. There are different proposed pathways to form black hole (BH) seeds, such as the remnants of the first stars (chapter 4), gas-dynamical processes (chapter 5), direct collapse (chapter 6), or stellar collisions in dense nuclear clusters (chapter 7). In this chapter, we discuss the probability of forming supermassive black holes (SMBHs) via these channels and determine the expected number density of the BH seeds. We start with a brief discussion of the observational constraints on SMBHs at low and high redshift that theoretical models have to reproduce (a more detailed account is provided in chapter 12). We further present the most popular formation channels of SMBHs, discuss under which conditions they can reproduce the observations, and compare various estimates in the literature on the expected number density of SMBHs. To account for the density of quasars at $z>6$ requires very efficient gas accretion mechanisms or high BH seeds masses. The bottleneck to obtain sufficiently high number densities of seed BHs with masses $>10^5$M$_\odot$ is the interplay between radiative and chemical feedback, which constrains the conditions for primordial, isothermal gas collapse.

preprint2018arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.