Paper detail

Statistical-physics-inspired model for intrinsic fluctuations driving supply and demand in markets

We propose a simple statistical-physics-inspired model for the effect of intrinsic fluctuations on supply and demand in markets. The model consists of agents that trade in two types of goods of which the total number is separately conserved. The relative preference of an individual agent for the two types of goods is determined by a utility that is identical for all agents. Market supply and demand curves are computed and compared for various motivated choices of the distribution of goods over the agents. In particular, we compare the "mean-field" case, in which all agents have the same number of goods and that is akin to the economics textbook case, to the case of Boltzmann-Gibbs distributed goods, in which agents have a fluctuating number of goods. We find that the resulting equilibrium prices are not equal for these two approaches, especially when a large fraction of the agents can neither buy nor sell.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.