Paper detail

Statistical Isotropy of the CMB E-mode signal

We test the statistical isotropy (SI) of the $E$-mode polarization of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) radiation observed by the Planck satellite using two statistics, namely, the contour Minkowski Tensor (CMT) and the Directional statistic ($\mathcal{D}$ statistic). The parameter $α$ obtained from the CMT provides information of the alignment of structures and can be used to infer statistical properties such as Gaussianity and SI of random fields. The $\mathcal{D}$ statistic is based on detecting preferred directionality shown by vectors defined by the field. These two tests are complementary to each other in terms of sensitivity at different angular scales. The CMT is sensitive towards small-scale information present in the CMB map while $\mathcal{D}$ statistic is more sensitive at large-scales. We compute $α$ and $\mathcal{D}$ statistic for the observed $E$-mode of CMB polarization, focusing on the SMICA maps, and compare with the values calculated using FFP10 SMICA simulations which contain both CMB and noise. We find good agreement between the observed data and simulations. Further, in order to specifically analyze the CMB signal in the data, we compare the values of the two statistics obtained from the observed Planck data with the values obtained from isotropic simulations having the same power spectrum, and from SMICA noise simulations. We find no statistically significant deviation from SI using the $α$ parameter. From $\mathcal{D}$ statistic we find that the data shows slight deviation from SI at large angular scales.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.