Paper detail

Statistical Eclipses of Close-in Kepler Sub-Saturns

We present a method to detect small atmospheric signals in Kepler's planet candidate light curves by averaging light curves for multiple candidates with similar orbital and physical characteristics. Our statistical method allows us to measure unbiased physical properties of Kepler's planet candidates, even for candidates whose individual signal-to-noise precludes the detection of their secondary eclipse. We detect a secondary eclipse depth of 3.83 +1.10/-1.11 ppm for a group of 31 sub-Saturn (R < 6 Earth radii) planet candidates with the greatest potential for a reflected light signature ((R_p/a)^2 > 10 ppm). Including Kepler-10b in this group increases the depth to 5.08 +0.71/-0.72 ppm. For a control group with (R_p/a)^2 < 1 ppm, we find a depth of 0.36 +/- 0.37 ppm, consistent with no detection. We also analyze the light curve of Kepler-10b and find an eclipse depth of 7.08 +/- 1.06 ppm. If the eclipses are due solely to reflected light, this corresponds to a geometric albedo of 0.22 +/- 0.06 for our group of close-in sub-Saturns, 0.37 +/- 0.05 if including Kepler-10b in the group, and 0.60 +/- 0.09 for Kepler-10b alone. Including a thermal emission model does not change the geometric albedo appreciably, assuming the Bond albedo is 2/3 the geometric albedo. Our result for Kepler-10b is consistent with previous works. Our result for close-in sub-Saturns shows that Kepler-10b is unusually reflective, but our analysis is consistent with the results of Demory (2014) for super-Earths. Our results also indicate that hot Neptunes are typically more reflective than hot Jupiters.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.