Paper detail

Statistical distributions of mean motion resonances and near-resonances in multiplanetary systems

The orbits of the confirmed exoplanets from all multiple systems known to date are investigated. Observational data from 1890 objects, of which 1176 are found in multiplanetary systems, are compiled and analyzed. Mean motion resonances and near-resonances up to the outer/inner orbital period ratio's value of 5 and the denominator 4 are tested for all adjacent exoplanet orbits. Each host star's snow line is calculated using a simple algorithm. The planets are reclassified into categories as a function of the semimajor axis size relative to the snow line location and the semimajor axis vs mass distribution. The fraction of planets in/near resonance is then plotted as a function of both resonance number and resonance order for all the exoplanet population and, separately, for each planet type. In the resonance number plot it appears that the 2/1 and 3/2 resonances and near-resonances are dominant overall and for the giant planets, but the observed distribution profile changes significantly with each planet category, with terrestrial planets, neptunes and mini-neptunes showing the largest variation. Resonances/near resonances around the value 5/3 were dominant for mini neptunes and terrestrial planets. In the order-based resonance/near-resonance plot, the observed distribution appears to follow an exponential decay for the general population and its profile appears to be influenced by the planet type. Approximate methods to estimate resonance/near resonance distributions are also attempted for the systems with unknown planet mass or with unknown star and/or planet mass and compared with the distribution of the planets with all the parameters known. A separate study of the resonance/near resonance fraction distribution as a function of mass is also attempted, but the low statistical data at very high planetary masses prevent the finding of an accurate equation to describe such a dependency.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.