Paper detail

Statistical Dependence Analyses of Operational Flight Data Used for Landing Reconstruction Enhancement

The RTS smoother is widely used for state estimation and it is utilized here to increase the data quality with respect to physical coherence and to increase resolution. The purpose of this paper is to enhance the performance of the RTS smoother to reconstruct an aircraft landing using on board recorded data only. Thereby, errors and uncertainties of operational flight data (e.g. altitude, attitude, position, speed) recorded during flights of civil aircraft are minimized. These data can be used for subsequent analyses in terms of flight safety or efficiency, which is commonly referred to as Flight Data Monitoring (FDM). Statistical assumptions of the smoother theory are not always verified during application but (consciously or not) assumed to be fulfilled. These assumptions can hardly be verified prior to the smoother application, however, they can be verified using the results of an initial smoother iteration and modifications of specific smoother characteristics can be suggested. This project specifically verifies assumptions on the measurement noise characteristics. Variance and covariance of the measurement noise can be checked after the initial smoother application. It is discovered that these characteristics change over time and should be accounted for with a time varying covariance matrix. This sequence of matrices is estimated by kernel smoothing and replaces an initially assumed fixed and diagonal covariance matrix used for the first smoother run. The results of this second smoother iteration are mostly improved compared to the initial iteration, i.e. the errors are significantly reduced. Subsequently, the remaining dependence structures of the residuals of the second smoother iteration can be captured by copula models. Their interpretation is useful for a revision of the physical model utilized by the RTS smoother.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.