Paper detail

Statistical comparison of clouds and star clusters

The extent to which the projected distribution of stars in a cluster is due to a large-scale radial gradient, and the extent to which it is due to fractal sub-structure, can be quantified -- statistically -- using the measure ${\cal Q} = \bar{m}/\bar{s}$. Here $\bar{m}$ is the normalized mean edge length of its minimum spanning tree (i.e. the shortest network of edges connecting all stars in the cluster) and $\bar{s}$ is the correlation length (i.e. the normalized mean separation between all pairs of stars). We show how ${\cal Q}$ can be indirectly applied to grey-scale images by decomposing the image into a distribution of points from which $\bar{m}$ and $\bar{s}$ can be calculated. This provides a powerful technique for comparing the distribution of dense gas in a molecular cloud with the distribution of the stars that condense out of it. We illustrate the application of this technique by comparing ${\cal Q}$ values from simulated clouds and star clusters.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.