Paper detail

Statistical Analysis of Stochastic Magnetic Fields

Previous work has introduced scale-split energy density ψfor a given vector field B in order to quantify the field stochasticity S(t). Application to turbulent magnetic fields leads to the prediction that tangling magnetic field by turbulence increases magnetic stochasticity. An increasing stochasticity in turn leads to disalignments of the coarse-grained fields at smaller scales thus they average to weaker fields at larger scales upon coarse-graining. The field&#39;s resistance against tanglement by the turbulence may lead at some point to its sudden slippage through the fluid, decreasing the stochasticity and increasing the energy density. Thus the maxima (minima) of magnetic stochasticity are expected to approximately coincide with the minima (maxima) of energy density, occurrence of which corresponds to slippage of the magnetic field through the fluid. Field-fluid slippage, on the other hand, has been already found to be intimately related to magnetic reconnection. In this paper, we test these theoretical predictions numerically using a homogeneous, incompressible magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) simulation. Apart from expected small scale deviations, possibly due to e.g., intermittency and strong field annihilation, the theoretically predicted global relationship between stochasticity and magnetic energy is observed in different sub-volumes of the simulation box. This may indicate ubiquitous local field-fluid slippage and small scale reconnection events in MHD turbulence. We also show that the maximum magnetic stochasticity, i.e., \partial_t S(t)=0 & \partial^2_t S(t)<0, leads to sudden increases in kinetic stochasticity level which may correspond to fluid jets driven by the reconnecting field lines, i.e., reconnection. This suggests a new mathematical approach to the reconnection problem.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.