Paper detail

Statistical analysis for precise estimation of structural properties of NGC 1960

The statistical analysis of gathered of astronomical objects (such as open cluster) are excellent tools to compute its parameters and to constrain the theory of its evolution. Here, we are represented detailed structural and membership analysis of an open cluster NGC 1960 through various statistical formulas and approaches. King empirical methods provide the information about the cluster extent as 5.2 +/- 0.4 pc. The exact identification of members of cluster is needed to precise estimation of its age, reddening, metallicity etc., therefore, to identify most probable members (MPMs), we adopted the combined approach of various statistical methods (kinematic, photometric and statistical) and 712 members are satisfied needed criteria of MPMs. The basic physical parameters of the cluster such as E(B-V)=0.23+/-0.02 mag, E(V-K)=1.05+/-0.03mag, log(Age)=7.35+/-0.05, and (m-M)=11.35+/-0.10 mag are obtained using the color-color and color-magnitude diagrams. NGC 1960 is found to be located at a distance of 1.34 +/- 0.03 kpc. Using the archival proper motion catalogues, we estimate mean proper motions of NGC 1960 as 0.83+/-0.26 mas yr-1 and -6.55+/-0.23 mas yr-1 in the direction of RA and DEC, respectively.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.