Paper detail

Stationary states in two lane traffic: insights from kinetic theory

Kinetics of dilute heterogeneous traffic on a two lane road is formulated in the framework of the Ben-Naim Krapivsky model and stationary state properties are analytically derived in the asymptotic limit. The heterogeneity is introduced as a quenched disorder in desired speeds of vehicles. The model assumes that each vehicle/platoon in a lane moves ballistically until it approaches a slow moving vehicle/platoon and then joins it. Vehicles in a platoon are assumed to escape the platoon at a constant rate by changing lanes. Each lane is assumed to have a different escape rate. As the stationary state is approached, the platoon density in the two lanes become equal, whereas the vehicle densities and fluxes are higher in the lane with lower escape rate. A majority of the vehicles enjoy a free-flow if the harmonic mean of the escape rates of the lanes is comparable to average initial flux on the road. The average platoon size is close to unity in the free-flow regime. If the harmonic mean is lower than the average initial flux, then vehicles with desired speeds lower than a characteristic speed $v^*$ still enjoy free-flow while those vehicles with desired speeds that are greater than $v^*$ experience congestion and form platoons behind the slower vehicles. The characteristic speed depends on the mean of escape times $(R=(R_1+R_{-1})/2)$ of the two lanes (represented by 1 and -1) as $v^* \sim R^{-\frac{1}{μ+2}}$, where $μ$ is the exponent of the quenched disorder distribution for desired speed in the small speed limit. The average platoon size in a lane, when $v^* \ll 1$, is proportional to $R^{\frac{μ+1}{μ+2}}$ plus a lane dependent correction. Equations for the kinetics of platoon size distribution for two-lane traffic are also studied. It is shown that a stationary state with platoons as large as road length can occur only if the mean escape rate is independent of platoon size.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.