Paper detail

Stationary and Free-fall frame Kerr black hole in gravity's rainbow

Doubly special relativity (DSR) is an effective model for encoding quantum gravity in flat spacetime. To incorporate DSR into general relativity, one could use gravity's rainbow, where the spacetime background felt by a test particle would depend on its energy. In this paper, we investigate the thermodynamics of rainbow Kerr black hole in the scenario with the stationary(ST) orthonormal frame and free-fall(FF) orthonormal frame. After the rainbow metric in ST frame and FF frame is deduced, the Hamilton-Jacobi method is used to acquire the modified Hawking temperature, specific heat and corresponding the modified entropy to each scenario, then the thermodynamic properties are discussed. We find that the effects of rainbow gravity on Kerr black holes are quite model-dependent. In other words, the value of parameter $η$ and $n$ with Amelino-Camelia's proposal are crucially important and worth discussing. Specificly, with most widly accepted choice ($n=2,η>0$), the effects of rainbow gravity tend to decrease the Hawking temperature but increase the black hole entropy in ST frame, and increase the Hawking temperature but decrease the black hole entropy in FF frame conversely.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.