Paper detail

Static Bondi Energy in the Teleparallel Equivalent of General Relativity

We consider Bondi's radiating metric in the context of the teleparallel equivalent of general relativity (TEGR). This metric describes the asymptotic form of a radiating solution of Einstein's equations. The total gravitational energy for this solution can be calculated by means of pseudo-tensors in the static case. In the nonstatic case, Bondi defines the {\it mass aspect} $m(u)$, which describes the mass of an isolated system. In this paper we express Bondi's solution in asymptotically spherical 3+1 coordinates, not in radiation coordinates, and obtain Bondi's energy in the static limit by means of the expression for the gravitational energy in the framework of the TEGR. We can either obtain the total energy or the energy inside a large (but finite) portion of the three-dimensional spacelike hypersurface, whose boundary is far away from the source. The relationship of the present energy expression with Moller's energy is established.

preprint1998arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.