Paper detail

Stateful Security Protocol Verification

A long-standing research problem in security protocol design is how to efficiently verify security protocols with tamper-resistant global states. In this paper, we address this problem by first proposing a protocol specification framework, which explicitly represents protocol execution states and state transformations. Secondly, we develop an algorithm for verifying security properties by utilizing the key ingredients of the first-order reasoning for reachability analysis, while tracking state transformation and checking the validity of newly generated states. Our verification algorithm is proven to be (partially) correct, if it terminates. We have implemented the proposed framework and verification algorithms in a tool named SSPA, and evaluate it using a number of stateful security protocols. The experimental results show that our approach is not only feasible but also practically efficient. In particular, we have found a security flaw on the digital envelope protocol, which could not be detected by existing security protocol verifiers.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.