Paper detail

State Space Reconstruction Parameters in the Analysis of Chaotic Time Series - the Role of the Time Window Length

The most common state space reconstruction method in the analysis of chaotic time series is the Method of Delays (MOD). Many techniques have been suggested to estimate the parameters of MOD, i.e. the time delay $τ$ and the embedding dimension $m$. We discuss the applicability of these techniques with a critical view as to their validity, and point out the necessity of determining the overall time window length, $τ_w$, for successful embedding. Emphasis is put on the relation between $τ_w$ and the dynamics of the underlying chaotic system, and we suggest to set $τ_w \geq τ_p$, the mean orbital period; $τ_p$ is approximated from the oscillations of the time series. The procedure is assessed using the correlation dimension for both synthetic and real data. For clean synthetic data, values of $τ_w$ larger than $τ_p$ always give good results given enough data and thus $τ_p$ can be considered as a lower limit ($τ_w \geq τ_p$). For noisy synthetic data and real data, an upper limit is reached for $τ_w$ which approaches $τ_p$ for increasing noise amplitude.

preprint1996arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.