Paper detail

Stars Crushed by Black Holes. I. On the Energy Distribution of Stellar Debris in Tidal Disruption Events

The distribution of orbital energies imparted into stellar debris following the close encounter of a star with a supermassive black hole is the principal factor in determining the rate of return of debris to the black hole, and thus in determining the properties of the resulting lightcurves from such events. We present simulations of tidal disruption events for a range of $β\equiv r_{\rm t}/r_{\rm p}$ where $r_{\rm p}$ is the pericentre distance and $r_{\rm t}$ the tidal radius. We perform these simulations at different spatial resolutions to determine the numerical convergence of our models. We compare simulations in which the heating due to shocks is included or excluded from the dynamics. For $β\lesssim 8$ the simulation results are well-converged at sufficiently moderate-to-high spatial resolution, while for $β\gtrsim 8$ the breadth of the energy distribution can be grossly exaggerated by insufficient spatial resolution. We find that shock heating plays a non-negligible role only for $β\gtrsim 4$, and that typically the effect of shock heating is mild. We show that self-gravity can modify the energy distribution over time after the debris has receded to large distances for all $β$. Primarily, our results show that across a range of impact parameters, while the shape of the energy distribution varies with $β$, the width of the energy spread imparted to the bulk of the debris is closely matched to the canonical spread, $ΔE = GM_\bullet R_\star/r_{\rm t}^2$, for the range of $β$ we have simulated.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.