Paper detail

Starcounts in the Hubble Deep Field: Constraining Galactic Structure Models

Stellar sources are identified in the Hubble Deep Field, and accurate colours and magnitudes are presented. The predictions of a Galactic starcounts model are compared with the faint stellar counts in this field. The model reproduces the observations very well in the magnitude range 21.0 < V < 26.4, while it overpredicts the counts by a factor of four in the range 26.4 < V < 30.0. The luminosity function for halo objects must be a factor of two smaller than that predicted by an extrapolation of the solar-neighborhood luminosity function for disc stars (with 95% confidence level). This result, seen before in deep Hubble Space Telescope images of globular clusters, is therefore confirmed for the halo field population. The possible nature of a group of faint-blue objects is also investigated, concluding that they are most likely non-stellar. The possibility that they are QSOs is ruled out. If we insist upon their stellar nature, they would be halo white dwarfs, with either a very steep halo white dwarf luminosity function for Mv > +11.0, or a stellar density 0.4 times that of the disc white dwarfs in the solar-neighborhood.

preprint1996arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.