Paper detail

Star-forming regions of the Aquila rift cloud complex. I. NH3 tracers of dense molecular cores

(Abridged) Aims. In the present part of our survey we search for ammonia emitters in the Aquila rift complex which trace the densest regions of molecular clouds. Methods. From a CO survey carried out with the Delingha 14-m telescope we selected ~150 targets for observations in other molecular lines. Here we describe the mapping observations in the NH3(1,1) and (2,2) inversion lines of the first 49 sources performed with the Effelsberg 100-m telescope. Results. The NH3(1,1) and (2,2) emission lines are detected in 12 and 7 sources, respectively. Among the newly discovered NH3 sources, our sample includes the following well-known clouds: the starless core L694-2, the Serpens cloud Cluster B, the Serpens dark cloud L572, the filamentary dark cloud L673, the isolated protostellar source B335, and the complex star-forming region Serpens South. Angular sizes between 40" and 80" (~0.04-0.08 pc) are observed for compact starless cores but as large as 9' (~0.5 pc) for filamentary dark clouds. The measured kinetic temperatures of the clouds lie between 9K and 18K. From NH3 excitation temperatures of 3-8K we determine H2 densities with typical values of ~(0.4-4) 10^4 cm^-3. The masses of the mapped cores range between ~0.05 and ~0.5M_solar. The relative ammonia abundance, X= [NH3]/[H2], varies from 10^-7 to 5 10^-7 with the mean <X> = (2.7+/-0.6) 10^-7 (estimated from spatially resolved cores assuming the filling factor eta = 1). In two clouds, we observe kinematically split NH3 profiles separated by ~1 km/s. The splitting is most likely due to bipolar molecular outflows for one of which we determine an acceleration of <~ 0.03 km/s/yr. A starless core with significant rotational energy is found to have a higher kinetic temperature than the other ones which is probably caused by magnetic energy dissipation.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.