Paper detail

Star formation rates and stellar masses in z ~ 1 gamma ray burst hosts

We analyse 4.5, 8 and 24 um band Spitzer images of six gamma ray burst host galaxies at redshifts close to 1. We constrain their star formation rates (SFR) based on the entire available spectral energy distribution rather than the 24 um band only. Further, we estimate their stellar masses (M*) based on rest frame K band luminosities. Our sample spans a wide range of galaxy properties: derived SFRs range from less than 10 to a few hundred solar masses per year; values of M* range from 10^9 to 10^10 Mo with a median of 5.6 x 10^9 Mo. Comparing the specific star formation rate (PHI = SFR/M*) of our sample as a function of M* to other representative types of galaxies (distant red galaxies, Ly-alpha emitters, Lyman break galaxies, submillimeter galaxies and z ~ 2 galaxies from the Great Observatories Origins Deep Survey-North field), we find that gamma ray burst hosts are among those with the highest PHI.

preprint2006arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.