Paper detail

Star Formation Rates and Extinction Properties of IR-Luminous Galaxies in the Spitzer First Look Survey

We investigate the instantaneous star formation rates (SFR) and extinction properties for a large (N=274), near-infrared (2.2 micron) + mid-infrared (24 micron) selected sample of normal to ultra-luminous infrared galaxies (ULIRGs) [10^9<L_{IR}/L_{sun}<10^12.5] with <z>~0.8 in the Spitzer Extragalactic First Look Survey. We combine Spitzer MIPS 24-micron observations with high-resolution, optical Keck Deimos spectroscopy to derive optical emission-line and infrared star formation rates (SFR_{opt} & SFR_{IR}, respectively). Direct comparison of these SFR diagnostics reveals that our sample exhibits a wide range of extinction (1.0<Av<4.0 mag). This is after removing spectroscopic and IRAC color-selected AGN candidates that account for 12% of the sample. Objects with SFRs of a few solar masses per year have Av values consistent with those of normal spirals (Av~1.0 mag). By contrast, LIRGs at z>1, which make up a large fraction of our sample, have SFR~100 M_{sun}/yr and <Av>~2.5 mag. This translates to a 97% mean attenuation of the [OII] forbidden line doublet, with the most extreme sources having as much as 99.7% of their [OII] line flux extinguished by dust. Based on a SFR_{IR}/SFR_{opt} diagnostic, we derive an IR-luminosity-dependent Av^{IR} function [Av^{IR}=0.75*log(L_{IR}/L_{sun})-6.35 mag] that we use to extinction correct our emission line luminosities. Application of this correction results in a correlation between SFR_{IR} and SFR_{opt} that has a dispersion of 0.2 dex. Investigation of the Av dependence on redshift reveals that for a fixed L_{IR}, there is no significant Av evolution. The mean attenuation of our sample is intermediate between that of local optical/UV- and radio-selected samples and has a marginally stronger L_{IR} dependence.

preprint2005arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access15 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.