Paper detail

Star formation laws in Luminous Infrared Galaxies. New observational constraints on models

The observational study of star formation relations in galaxies is central to unraveling the physical processes at work on local and global scales. We wish to expand the sample of extreme starbursts, represented by local LIRGs and ULIRGs, with high quality observations in the 1-0 line of HCN. We study if a universal law can account for the star formation relations observed for the dense molecular gas in normal star forming galaxies and extreme starbursts. We have used the IRAM 30m telescope to observe a sample of 19 LIRGs in the 1-0 lines of CO, HCN and HCO+. The analysis of the new data proves that the efficiency of star formation in the dense molecular gas (SFE-dense) of extreme starbursts is a factor 3-4 higher compared to normal galaxies. We find a duality in Kennicutt-Schmidt (KS) laws that is reinforced if we account for the different conversion factor for HCN (alpha-HCN) in extreme starbursts and for the unobscured star formation rate in normal galaxies. This result extends to the higher molecular densities probed by HCN lines the more extreme bimodal behavior of star formation laws, derived from CO molecular lines by two recent surveys. We have confronted our observations with the predictions of theoretical models in which the efficiency of star formation is determined by the ratio of a constant star formation rate per free-fall time (SFR-ff) to the local free-fall time. We find that it is possible to fit the observed differences in the SFE-dense between normal galaxies and LIRGs/ULIRGs using a common constant SFR-ff and a set of physically acceptable HCN densities, but only if SFR-ff~0.005-0.01 and/or if alpha-HCN is a factor of a few lower than our favored values. Star formation recipes that explicitly depend on the galaxy global dynamical time scales do not significantly improve the fit to the new HCN data presented in this work.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access8 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.