Paper detail

Star Formation in Ultrafaint Dwarfs: Continuous or Single-age Bursts?

We model the chemical evolution of six UFDs: Bootes I, Canes Venatici II, Coma Berenices, Hercules, Leo IV and Ursa Major I, based on their recently determined star formation histories. We show that two single-age bursts cannot explain the observed [$α$/Fe] vs [Fe/H] distribution in these galaxies and that some self-enrichment is required within the first burst. An alternative scenario is modelled, in which star formation is continuous except for short interruptions when one or more supernovae temporarily blow the dense gas out from the centre of the system. This model allows for self-enrichment and can reproduce the chemical abundances of the UFDs in which the second burst is only a trace population. We conclude that the most likely star formation history is one or two extended periods of star formation, with the first burst lasting for at least 100 Myr. As found in earlier work, the observed properties of UFDs can be explained by formation at a low mass ($M_{\rm{vir}}\sim10^7$ M$_\odot$), rather than being stripped remnants of much larger systems.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.