Paper detail

Star formation in extremely faint dwarf galaxies

We study the relationship between the gas column density (derived from GMRT 21 cm data) and the star formation rate surface density (derived from publicly available GALEX data) for a sample of 23 extremely faint dwarf irregular galaxies drawn from the Faint Irregular Galaxy GMRT Survey (FIGGS). Our sample galaxies have a median HI mass of 2.8e07 solar masses and a median blue magnitude -13.2. We find that gas column density averaged over the star forming region of the disk lies below most estimates of the "threshold density" for star formation, and that the average star formation rate surface density for most of the galaxies is also lower than would be expected from the "Kennicutt-Schmidt" law (Kennnicutt 1998}. We also use our data to look for small scale (400 pc and 200 pc) correlations. At 400 pc linear resolution, for 18 of our 23 galaxies, we find that star formation rate surface density can be parametrized as having a power law dependence on gas column density, which varies accross the sample and is in general steeper than "Kennicutt-Schmidt" law. The power law relation holds until one reaches the sensitivity limit of the GALEX data, i.e. we find no evidence for a "threshold density" below which star formation is completely cut off. For the 5 galaxies for which a power law does not provide a good parametrization, there are substantial offsets between the UV bright regions and the HI high column density maps. At 200 pc resolution, the offsets between the peaks in the HI and UV images are more pronounced, and a power law parametrization is possible for only 5 of 10 galaxies.

preprint2009arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.