Paper detail

Star Formation Feedback and Metal Enrichment History Of The Intergalactic Medium

Using hydrodynamic simulations we compute the metal enrichment history of the intergalactic medium (IGM). We show that galactic superwind (GSW) feedback can transport metals to the IGM and that the properties of simulated metal absorbers match observations. The distance of influence of GSW is typically limited to >0.5Mpc and within regions of overdensity >10. Most CIV and OVI absorbers are located within shocked regions of elevated temperature (T>2x10^4K), overdensity (>10), and metallicity ([-2.5,-0.5]). OVI absorbers have typically higher metallicity, lower density and higher temperature than CIV absorbers. For OVI absorbers collisional ionization dominates over the entire redshift range z=0-6, whereas for CIV absorbers the transition occurs at moderate redshift z~3 from collisionally dominated to photoionization dominated. We find that the observed column density distributions for CIV and OVI in the range log N cm^2=12-15 are reasonably reproduced by the simulations. The evolution of mass densities contained in CIV and OVI lines, Omega_CIV and Omega_OVI, is also in good agreement with observations, which shows a near constancy at low redshifts and an exponential drop beyond redshift z=3-4. For both CIV and OVI, most absorbers are transient and the amount of metals probed by CIV and OVI lines of column log N cm^2=12-15 is only ~2% of total metal density at any epoch. While gravitational shocks from large-scale structure formation dominate the energy budget (80-90%) for turning about 50% of IGM to the warm-hot intergalactic medium (WHIM) by z=0, GSW feedback shocks are energetically dominant over gravitational shocks at z > 1-2. Most of the so-called "missing metals" at z=2-3 are hidden in a warm-hot (T=10^{4.5-7}K) gaseous phase, heated up by GSW feedback shocks. Their mass distribution is broadly peaked at $δ=1-10$ in the IGM, outside virialized halos.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.