Paper detail

Star formation black hole growth and dusty tori in the most luminous AGNs at z=2-3.5

We report herschel observations of 100 very luminous, optically selected AGNs at z=2-3.5 with log(LUV)(erg/sec)> 46.5, where LUV=L1350A. The distribution in LUV is similar to the general distribution of SDSS AGNs in this redshift and luminosity interval. We measured SF luminosity, LSF, and SFR in 34 detected sources by fitting combined SF and WISE-based torus templates. We also obtained statistically significant stacks for the undetected sources in two luminosity groups. The sample properties are compared with those of very luminous AGNs at z>4.5. The main findings are: 1) The mean and the median SFRs of the detected sources are 1176 and 1010 Msun/yr, respectively. The mean SFR of the undetected sources is 148 Msun/yr. The ratio of SFR to BH accretion rate is approximately 80 for the detected sources and less than 10 for the undetected sources. There is no difference in LAGN and only a very small difference in L(torus) between detected and undetected sources. 2) The redshift distribution of LSF and LAGN for the most luminous, redshift 2-7 AGNs are different. The highest LAGN are found at z=~3. However, LSF of such sources peaks at z=~5. Assuming the objects in our sample are hosted by the most massive galaxies at those redshifts, we find many of them are below the main-sequence of SF galaxies at z=2-3.5. 3) The SEDs of dusty tori at high redshift are similar to those found in low redshift, low luminosity AGNs. Herschel upper limits put strong constraints on the long wavelength SED ruling out several earlier suggested torus templates. 4) We find no evidence for a luminosity dependence of the torus covering factor in sources with log(LAGN)=44-47.5. This conclusion is based on the highly uncertain and non-uniformally treated LAGN in many earlier studies. The median covering factors over this range are 0.68 for isotropic dust emission and 0.4 for anisotropic emission.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.