Paper detail

Star formation and environment in clusters up to z~2.2

The dependence of galaxy star formation activity on environment - especially in clusters - at high redshift is still poorly understood, as illustrated by the still limited number of z>1.4 clusters on the one hand, and by the still debated star formation-density relation at high redshift on the other hand. The zphot~2.2 JKCS041 cluster allows to probe such environmental dependence of star formation activity at an unprecedented combination of redshifts and environments. Its study permits to enlarge the knowledge of high redshift clusters and to put strong leverage on observational constraints for galaxy evolution models. We analyze deep u\astg'r'i'z'JHKs images from the CFHTLS/WIRDS surveys, which cover JKCS041 cluster field. We first estimate photometric redshifts based on multi-wavelength photometry. We then lead a careful analysis to test the presence of a Butcher-Oemler effect. We work on galaxies within 2\timesr200 and with masses >1.34\times10^11 Msun, and use two comparison clusters at z=0 and z=1 of similar mass. We estimate the radial profiles of the fraction of blue galaxies, taking into account the star aging with decreasing redshift. After confirming the high redshift nature of JKCS041, we find no evidence for a Butcher-Oemler effect between z~2.2 and z~0 for galaxies more massive than 1.34\times10^11 Msun. In the cluster center, a change greater than \Deltafblue/\Deltaz=0.16 between z~0 and z~2.2 would be easily detected. We also find that JKCS041 shows a consistent and systematic increase of the fraction of star-forming galaxies with cluster-centric distance, hence with decreasing density, for both a M>1.34\times10^11 Msun selected sample and a lower mass sample. In particular, very few (less than 15%) star-forming galaxies are found within r200/2 among high mass (M>1.34\times10^11 Msun) galaxies. Our results show that the present-day star formation-density relation is already in place at z~2.2.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.