Paper detail

Star formation and black hole growth at z=4.8

We report Herschel Spitzer and Wise observations of 44 z=4.8 optically selected active galactic nuclei (AGNs). This sample contains the highest mass black holes (BHs) at this redshift. Ten of the objects were detected by Herschel and five show emission that is not associated with the AGNs. The star formation (SF) luminosity (LSF) obtained by fitting the spectral energy distribution (SED) with standard SF templates is in the range 10^(46.62-47.21) erg/s corresponding to SF rates of 1090-4240 Msun/yr. Fitting with luminous submillimeter galaxy SEDs gives SF rates that are smaller by 0.05 dex when using all bands and 0.1 dex when ignoring the 250-mic band. A 40K gray-body fits to only the 500-mic fluxes reduce LSF by about a factor two. Stacking analysis of 29 undetected sources give significant signals in all three bands. A SF template fit indicates LSF=10^(46.19-46.23) erg/s depending on the assume AGN contribution. A 40K fit to the stacked 500-mic flux gives LSF=10^(45.95) erg/s. The mean BH mass (mbh) and AGN luminosity (LAGN) of the detected sources are significantly higher than those of the undetected ones. The spectral differences are seen all the way from UV to far infrared wavelengths. The mean optical-UV spectra are similar to the ones predicted for thin accretion disks around BHs with the measured masses and accretion rates. We suggest two alternative explanations to the correlation of LSF, LAGN and mbh, one involving no AGN feedback and the second a moderate feedback that affects, but not totally quench SF in 3/4 of the sources. We compare our LSF and LAGN to lower redshift samples and show a new correlation between LSF and mbh. We also examine several rather speculative ideas about the host galaxy properties including the possibility that the detected sources are above the SF mass sequence (MS) at z=4.8, perhaps in mergers, and most of the undetected sources are on the MS.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.