Paper detail

Star Discrepancy Subset Selection: Problem Formulation and Efficient Approaches for Low Dimensions

Motivated by applications in instance selection, we introduce the star discrepancy subset selection problem, which consists of finding a subset of m out of n points that minimizes the star discrepancy. First, we show that this problem is NP-hard. Then, we introduce a mixed integer linear formulation (MILP) and a combinatorial branch-and-bound (BB) algorithm for the star discrepancy subset selection problem and we evaluate both approaches against random subset selection and a greedy construction on different use-cases in dimension two and three. Our results show that the MILP and BB are efficient in dimension two for large and small $m/n$ ratio, respectively, and for not too large n. However, the performance of both approaches decays strongly for larger dimensions and set sizes. As a side effect of our empirical comparisons we obtain point sets of discrepancy values that are much smaller than those of common low-discrepancy sequences, random point sets, and of Latin Hypercube Sampling. This suggests that subset selection could be an interesting approach for generating point sets of small discrepancy value.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.