Paper detail

Star Cluster Mass and Age Distributions of Two Fields in M83 Based on HST/WFC3 Observations

We study star clusters in two fields in the nearby spiral galaxy M83 using broad and narrow band optical imaging taken with the WFC3 on-board HST. We present results based on several different catalogs of star clusters in an inner and outer field, and conclude that different methods of selection do not strongly impact the results, particularly for clusters older than $\approx$10 Myr. The age distributions can be described by a power law, $dN/dτ\proptoτ^γ$, with $γ\approx -$0.84$\pm$0.12 in the inner field, and $γ\approx -$0.48$\pm$0.12 in the outer field for $τ\gtrsim$10 Myr. We bracket the difference, $Δγ$, between the two fields to be in the range 0.18$-$0.36, based on estimates of the relative star formation histories. The mass functions can also be described by a power law, $dN/dM\propto M^β$, with $β\approx -$1.98$\pm$0.14 and $β\approx $2.34$\pm$0.26 in the inner and outer fields, respectively. We conclude that the shapes of the mass and age distributions of the clusters in the two fields are similar, as predicted by the "quasi-universal" model. Any differences between the two fields are at the $\approx$2$-$3$σ(\approx$1$-$2$σ)$ level for the age (mass) distributions. Therefore any dependence of these distributions on the local environment is probably weak. We compare the shapes of the distributions with those predicted by two popular cluster disruption models, and find that both show evidence that the clusters are disrupted at a rate that is approximately independent of their mass, but that the observational results do not support the earlier disruption of lower mass clusters relative to their higher mass counterparts.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.