Paper detail

Star Cluster Evolution, Dynamical Age Estimation and the Kinematical Signature of Star Formation

We use N-body integration to follow the evolution of clusters of 200 binary systems with different initial half mass radii $R_{0.5}$. We also simulate single-star clusters. All clusters evolve according to the same $n(t)$ curve, where $n(t)$ is the number density of stars in the central 2~pc sphere at time $t$. $n(t)$ and the lifetime are independent of (i) the inital proportion of binaries and (ii) the initial $R_{0.5}$. Mass segregation measures the dynamical age of the cluster. The proportion of binaries in the central cluster region is a sensitive indicator of the initial cluster concentration. If most stars form in binaries in a typical embedded cluster which is located at the edge of a giant molecular cloud, then we estimate that at most about 10~per cent of all pre-main sequence stars achieve near escape velocities from the molecular cloud. The large ejection velocities resulting from close encounters between binary systems imply a `halo' distribution of young stars over large areas surrounding star forming sites which is expected to have a significantly reduced binary proportion and a significantly increased proportion of stars with depleted circumstellar disks. We compare the time dependent model single star and system luminosity function in the central cluster region with the observational Hyades and Pleiades luminosity functions and find no evidence for different dynamical properties of stellar systems at birth in the Hyades, Pleiades and Galactic field stellar samples. The observed proportion of binary stars in the very young Trapezium Cluster is consistent with the early dynamical evolution of a cluster with a very high initial stellar number density.

preprint1995arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.