Paper detail

Standard Models and Split Supersymmetry from Intersecting Brane Orbifolds

We construct four dimensional three generation non-supersymmetric $SU(3)_c \times SU(2)_L \times U(1)_Y$ intersecting D6-brane models with $ν_R$\rq{s}. At three stacks we find exactly the MSSM chiral fermion matter spectrum. At 4-, 5-stacks we find models with the massless fermion spectrum of the N=1 Standard Model and massive exotic non-chiral matter; these models flow also to only the SM. At 8-stacks we find MSSM-like models, with minimal massless exotics, made from two different N=1 sectors. Exotic triplet masses put a lower bound on the string scale of $2.79/2.89 \times 10^6$ GeV for a Higgs 124/126 GeV. It\rq{}s the first appearance of N=0 stringy quivers with the MSSM and matter in antisymmetric representations and perturbatively missing Yukawa couplings. The present models are based on orientifolds of ${\bf T^6/(Z_3 \times Z_3)}$ compactifications of IIA theory based on the torus lattice AAA; all complex moduli are fixed by the orbifold symmetry. We also present the spectrum rules + GS anomaly cancellation for the ABB lattice. Moreover, we point out the relevance of intersecting/and present D6-brane constructions on ideas related to existence of split supersymmetry in nature. In this context we present non-susy models with only the SM-matter and also MSSM-matter dominated models, with massive gauginos and light higgsinos, that achieve the correct supersymmetric GUT value for the Weinberg angle $sin^2 θ= \frac{3}{8}$ at a string scale $5 \cdot 10^{13} \ GeV < M_{S} < 1.4 \cdot 10^{17}$ GeV. It appears that if only the SM survives at low energy the unification scale is preserved at $5.03 \times 10^{13}$ GeV when n$_H$ =1, 3, 6. These models support the existence of split supersymmetry scenario in string theory.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.