Paper detail

Standard Model in multiscale theories and observational constraints

We construct and analyze the Standard Model of electroweak and strong interactions in multiscale spacetimes with (i) weighted derivatives and (ii) $q$-derivatives. Both theories can be formulated in two different frames, called fractional and integer picture. By definition, the fractional picture is where physical predictions should be made. (i) In the theory with weighted derivatives, it is shown that gauge invariance and the requirement of having constant masses in all reference frames make the Standard Model in the integer picture indistinguishable from the ordinary one. Experiments involving only weak and strong forces are insensitive to a change of spacetime dimensionality also in the fractional picture, and only the electromagnetic and gravitational sectors can break the degeneracy. For the simplest multiscale measures with only one characteristic time, length and energy scale $t_*$, $\ell_*$ and $E_*$, we compute the Lamb shift in the hydrogen atom and constrain the multiscale correction to the ordinary result, getting the absolute upper bound $t_*<10^{-23}\,{\rm s}$. For the natural choice $α_0=1/2$ of the fractional exponent in the measure, this bound is strengthened to $t_*<10^{-29}\,{\rm s}$, corresponding to $\ell_*<10^{-20}\,{\rm m}$ and $E_*>28\,{\rm TeV}$. Stronger bounds are obtained from the measurement of the fine-structure constant. (ii) In the theory with $q$-derivatives, considering the muon decay rate and the Lamb shift in light atoms, we obtain the independent absolute upper bounds $t_* < 10^{-13}{\rm s}$ and $E_*>35\,\text{MeV}$. For $α_0=1/2$, the Lamb shift alone yields $t_*<10^{-27}\,{\rm s}$, $\ell_*<10^{-19}\,{\rm m}$ and $E_*>450\,\text{GeV}$.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.