Paper detail

Standard Lattices of Compatibly Embedded Finite Fields

Lattices of compatibly embedded finite fields are useful in computer algebra systems for managing many extensions of a finite field $\mathbb{F}_p$ at once. They can also be used to represent the algebraic closure $\bar{\mathbb{F}}_p$, and to represent all finite fields in a standard manner. The most well known constructions are Conway polynomials, and the Bosma-Cannon-Steel framework used in Magma. In this work, leveraging the theory of the Lenstra-Allombert isomorphism algorithm, we generalize both at the same time. Compared to Conway polynomials, our construction defines a much larger set of field extensions from a small pre-computed table; however it is provably as inefficient as Conway polynomials if one wants to represent all field extensions, and thus yields no asymptotic improvement for representing $\bar{\mathbb{F}}_p$. Compared to Bosma-Cannon-Steel lattices, it is considerably more efficient both in computation time and storage: all algorithms have at worst quadratic complexity, and storage is linear in the number of represented field extensions and their degrees. Our implementation written in C/Flint/Julia/Nemo shows that our construction in indeed practical.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.