Paper detail

Staircase Codes for Secret Sharing with Optimal Communication and Read Overheads

We study the communication efficient secret sharing (CESS) problem introduced by Huang, Langberg, Kliewer and Bruck. A classical threshold secret sharing scheme randomly encodes a secret into $n$ shares given to $n$ parties, such that any set of at least $t$, $t<n$, parties can reconstruct the secret, and any set of at most $z$, $z<t$, parties cannot obtain any information about the secret. Recently, Huang et al. characterized the achievable minimum communication overhead (CO) necessary for a legitimate user to decode the secret when contacting $d\geq t$ parties and presented explicit code constructions achieving minimum CO for $d=n$. The intuition behind the possible savings on CO is that the user is only interested in decoding the secret and does not have to decode the random keys involved in the encoding process. In this paper, we introduce a new class of linear CESS codes called Staircase Codes over any field $GF(q)$, for any prime power $q> n$. We describe two explicit constructions of Staircase codes that achieve minimum communication and read overheads respectively for a fixed $d$, and universally for all possible values of $d, t\leq d\leq n$.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.