Paper detail

Stacking catalog sources in WMAP data

We stack WMAP 7-year temperature data around extragalactic point sources, showing that the profiles are consistent with WMAP's beam models, in disagreement with the findings of Sawangwit & Shanks (2010). These results require that the source sample's selection is not biased by CMB fluctuations. We compare profiles from sources in the standard WMAP catalog, the WMAP catalog selected from a CMB-free combination of data, and the NVSS catalog, and quantify the agreement with fits to simple parametric beam models. We estimate the biases in source profiles due to alignments with positive CMB fluctuations, finding them roughly consistent with those biases found with the WMAP standard catalog. Addressing those biases, we find source spectral indices significantly steeper than those used by WMAP, with strong evidence for spectral steepening above 61 GHz. Such changes modify the power spectrum correction required for unresolved point sources, and tend to weaken somewhat the evidence for deviation from a Harrison-Zel'dovich primordial spectrum, but more analysis is required. Finally, we discuss implications for current CMB experiments.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.