Paper detail

Stackelberg Shortest Path Tree Game, Revisited

Let $G(V,E)$ be a directed graph with $n$ vertices and $m$ edges. The edges $E$ of $G$ are divided into two types: $E_F$ and $E_P$. Each edge of $E_F$ has a fixed price. The edges of $E_P$ are the priceable edges and their price is not fixed a priori. Let $r$ be a vertex of $G$. For an assignment of prices to the edges of $E_P$, the revenue is given by the following procedure: select a shortest path tree $T$ from $r$ with respect to the prices (a tree of cheapest paths); the revenue is the sum, over all priceable edges $e$, of the product of the price of $e$ and the number of vertices below $e$ in $T$. Assuming that $k=|E_P|\ge 2$ is a constant, we provide a data structure whose construction takes $O(m+n\log^{k-1} n)$ time and with the property that, when we assign prices to the edges of $E_P$, the revenue can be computed in $(\log^{k-1} n)$. Using our data structure, we save almost a linear factor when computing the optimal strategy in the Stackelberg shortest paths tree game of [D. Bil{ò} and L. Gual{à} and G. Proietti and P. Widmayer. Computational aspects of a 2-Player Stackelberg shortest paths tree game. Proc. WINE 2008].

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.