Paper detail

Stack and register complexity of radix conversions

We investigate the question of computational resources (such as stacks and counters) necessary to perform radix conversions. To this end it is shown that no PDA can compute the significand of the best $n$-digit floating point approximation of a power of an incommensurable radix. This extends the results of W.~Clinger. We also prove that a two counter machine with input is capable of such conversions. On the other hand we note a curious asymmetry with respect to the order in which the digits are input by showing that a two counter machine can decode its input online if the digits are presented in the most-to-least significant order while no such machine can decode its input in this manner if the digits are presented in the least-to-most significant order. Some structural results about two counter machines (with input) are also established.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.