Paper detail

Stable Phase Retrieval from Locally Stable and Conditionally Connected Measurements

This paper is concerned with stable phase retrieval for a family of phase retrieval models we name "locally stable and conditionally connected" (LSCC) measurement schemes. For every signal $f$, we associate a corresponding weighted graph $G_f$, defined by the LSCC measurement scheme, and show that the phase retrievability of the signal $f$ is determined by the connectivity of $G_f$. We then characterize the phase retrieval stability of the signal $f$ by two measures that are commonly used in graph theory to quantify graph connectivity: the Cheeger constant of $G_f$ for real valued signals, and the algebraic connectivity of $G_f$ for complex valued signals. We use our results to study the stability of two phase retrieval models that can be cast as LSCC measurement schemes, and focus on understanding for which signals the "curse of dimensionality" can be avoided. The first model we discuss is a finite-dimensional model for locally supported measurements such as the windowed Fourier transform. For signals "without large holes", we show the stability constant exhibits only a mild polynomial growth in the dimension, in stark contrast with the exponential growth which uniform stability constants tend to suffer from; more precisely, in $R^d$ the constant grows proportionally to $d^{1/2}$, while in $C^d$ it grows proportionally to $d$. We also show the growth of the constant in the complex case cannot be reduced, suggesting that complex phase retrieval is substantially more difficult than real phase retrieval. The second model we consider is an infinite-dimensional phase retrieval problem in a principal shift invariant space. We show that despite the infinite dimensionality of this model, signals with monotone exponential decay will have a finite stability constant. In contrast, the stability bound provided by our results will be infinite if the signal's decay is polynomial.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.