Paper detail

Stable Matchings with Restricted Preferences: Structure and Complexity

It is well known that every stable matching instance $I$ has a rotation poset $R(I)$ that can be computed efficiently and the downsets of $R(I)$ are in one-to-one correspondence with the stable matchings of $I$. Furthermore, for every poset $P$, an instance $I(P)$ can be constructed efficiently so that the rotation poset of $I(P)$ is isomorphic to $P$. In this case, we say that $I(P)$ realizes $P$. Many researchers exploit the rotation poset of an instance to develop fast algorithms or to establish the hardness of stable matching problems. In order to gain a parameterized understanding of the complexity of sampling stable matchings, Bhatnagar et al. [SODA 2008] introduced stable matching instances whose preference lists are restricted but nevertheless model situations that arise in practice. In this paper, we study four such parameterized restrictions; our goal is to characterize the rotation posets that arise from these models: $k$-bounded, $k$-attribute, $(k_1, k_2)$-list, $k$-range. We prove that there is a constant $k$ so that every rotation poset is realized by some instance in the first three models for some fixed constant $k$. We describe efficient algorithms for constructing such instances given the Hasse diagram of a poset. As a consequence, the fundamental problem of counting stable matchings remains $\#$BIS-complete even for these restricted instances. For $k$-range preferences, we show that a poset $P$ is realizable if and only if the Hasse diagram of $P$ has pathwidth bounded by functions of $k$. Using this characterization, we show that the following problems are fixed parameter tractable when parametrized by the range of the instance: exactly counting and uniformly sampling stable matchings, finding median, sex-equal, and balanced stable matchings.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.