Paper detail

Stabilizing Nonuniformly Quantized Compressed Sensing with Scalar Companders

This paper studies the problem of reconstructing sparse or compressible signals from compressed sensing measurements that have undergone nonuniform quantization. Previous approaches to this Quantized Compressed Sensing (QCS) problem based on Gaussian models (bounded l2-norm) for the quantization distortion yield results that, while often acceptable, may not be fully consistent: re-measurement and quantization of the reconstructed signal do not necessarily match the initial observations. Quantization distortion instead more closely resembles heteroscedastic uniform noise, with variance depending on the observed quantization bin. Generalizing our previous work on uniform quantization, we show that for nonuniform quantizers described by the "compander" formalism, quantization distortion may be better characterized as having bounded weighted lp-norm (p >= 2), for a particular weighting. We develop a new reconstruction approach, termed Generalized Basis Pursuit DeNoise (GBPDN), which minimizes the sparsity of the reconstructed signal under this weighted lp-norm fidelity constraint. We prove that for B bits per measurement and under the oversampled QCS scenario (when the number of measurements is large compared to the signal sparsity) if the sensing matrix satisfies a proposed generalized Restricted Isometry Property, then, GBPDN provides a reconstruction error of sparse signals which decreases like O(2^{-B}/\sqrt{p+1}): a reduction by a factor \sqrt{p+1} relative to that produced by using the l2-norm. Besides the QCS scenario, we also show that GBPDN applies straightforwardly to the related case of CS measurements corrupted by heteroscedastic Generalized Gaussian noise with provable reconstruction error reduction. Finally, we describe an efficient numerical procedure for computing GBPDN via a primal-dual convex optimization scheme, and demonstrate its effectiveness through simulations.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.