Paper detail

Stability of the EW vacuum, Higgs boson, and new physics

The possibility that the Standard Model (SM) is valid up to the Planck scale $M_P$, i.e. that new physics occurs only around $M_P$, is nowadays largely explored. For a metastable EW vacuum, we show that new physics interactions can have a great impact on its lifetime, and, differently from previous analyses, they cannot be neglected. Therefore, contrary to usual believes, the stability phase diagram of the SM depends on new physics. This has far reaching consequences. Beyond SM theories can be tested against their prediction for the stability of the EW vacuum. Moreover, despite of some recent claims, higher precision measurements of the top and Higgs masses cannot provide any definite answer on the SM stability properties. Finally, doubts on Higgs inflation scenarios, all based on results obtained neglecting new physics interactions, are also cast.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.