Paper detail

Stability of Hardy-Sobolev inequality involving p-Laplace

This paper is devoted to considering the following Hardy-Sobolev inequality \[ \int_{\mathbb{R}^N}|\nabla u|^p \mathrm{d}x \geq \mathcal{S}_β\left(\int_{\mathbb{R}^N}\frac{|u|^{p^*_β}}{|x|^β} \mathrm{d}x\right)^\frac{p}{p^*_β},\quad \forall u\in C^\infty_0(\mathbb{R}^N), \] for some constant $\mathcal{S}_β>0$, where $1<p<N$, $0\leq β<p$, $p^*_β=\frac{p(N-β)}{N-p}$. Firstly, since this problem involves quasilinear operator, we need to establish a compact embedding theorem for some suitable weighted spaces. Moreover, due to the Hardy term $|x|^{-β}$, some new estimates are established. Based on those works, we give the classification to the linearized problem related to the extremals which has its own interest such as in blow-up analysis. Then we investigate the gradient stability of above inequality by using spectral estimate combined with a compactness argument, which extends the work of Figalli and Zhang (Duke Math. J., 2022) to a weighted case.

preprint2023arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.