Paper detail

Stability of extended defects on boron nitride and graphene monolayers: the role of chemical environment

We perform ab initio calculations that indicate that the relative stability of antiphase boundaries (APB) with armchair and zigzag chiralities in monolayer boron nitride (BN) is determined by the chemical potentials of the boron and nitrogen species in the synthesis process. In an N-rich environment, a zigzag APB with N-rich core is the most stable structure, while under B-rich or intrinsic growth conditions, an armchair APB with stoichiometric core is the most stable. This stability transition is shown to arise from a competition between homopolar-bond (B-B and N-N) and elastic energy costs in the core of the APBs. Moreover, in the presence of a carbon source we find that a carbon-doped zigzag APB becomes the most stable boundary near the N-rich limit. The electronic structure of the two types of APBs in BN is shown to be particularly distinct, with the zigzag APB depicting defect-like deep electronic bands in the band gap, while the armchair APB shows bulk-like shallow electronic bands.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.