Paper detail

Stability and super-resolution of generalized spike recovery

We consider the problem of recovering a linear combination of Dirac delta functions and derivatives from a finite number of Fourier samples corrupted by noise. This is a generalized version of the well-known spike recovery problem, which is receiving much attention recently. We analyze the numerical conditioning of this problem in two different settings depending on the order of magnitude of the quantity $Nη$, where $N$ is the number of Fourier samples and $η$ is the minimal distance between the generalized spikes. In the "well-conditioned" regime $Nη\gg1$, we provide upper bounds for first-order perturbation of the solution to the corresponding least-squares problem. In the near-colliding, or "super-resolution" regime $Nη\to0$ with a single cluster, we propose a natural regularization scheme based on decimating the samples \textendash{} essentially increasing the separation $η$ \textendash{} and demonstrate the effectiveness and near-optimality of this scheme in practice.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.