Paper detail

Stability and chaos in Kustaanheimo-Stiefel space induced by the Hopf fibration

The need for the extra dimension in Kustaanheimo-Stiefel (KS) regularization is explained by the topology of the Hopf fibration, which defines the geometry and structure of KS space. A trajectory in Cartesian space is represented by a four-dimensional manifold, called the fundamental manifold. Based on geometric and topological aspects classical concepts of stability are translated to KS language. The separation between manifolds of solutions generalizes the concept of Lyapunov stability. The dimension-raising nature of the fibration transforms fixed points, limit cycles, attractive sets, and Poincaré sections to higher-dimensional subspaces. From these concepts chaotic systems are studied. In strongly perturbed problems the numerical error can break the topological structure of KS space: points in a fiber are no longer transformed to the same point in Cartesian space. An observer in three dimensions will see orbits departing from the same initial conditions but diverging in time. This apparent randomness of the integration can only be understood in four dimensions. The concept of topological stability results in a simple method for estimating the time scale in which numerical simulations can be trusted. Ideally all trajectories departing from the same fiber should be KS transformed to a unique trajectory in three-dimensional space, because the fundamental manifold that they constitute is unique. By monitoring how trajectories departing from one fiber separate from the fundamental manifold a critical time, equivalent to the Lyapunov time, is estimated. These concepts are tested on N-body examples: the Pythagorean problem, and an example of field stars interacting with a binary.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors6 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.