Paper detail

Stability analysis of a model gene network links aging, stress resistance, and negligible senescence

Several animal species are considered to exhibit what is called negligible senescence, i.e. they do not show signs of functional decline or any increase of mortality with age, and do not have measurable reductions in reproductive capacity with age. Recent studies in Naked Mole Rat (NMR) and long- lived sea urchin showed that the level of gene expression changes with age is lower than in other organisms. These phenotypic observations correlate well with exceptional endurance of NMR tissues to various genotoxic stresses. Therefore, the lifelong transcriptional stability of an organism may be a key determinant of longevity. However, the exact relation between genetic network stability, stress-resistance and aging has not been defined. We analyze the stability of a simple genetic- network model of a living organism under the influence of external and endogenous factors. We demonstrate that under most common circumstances a gene network is inherently unstable and suffers from exponential accumulation of gene-regulation deviations leading to death. However, should the repair systems be sufficiently effective, the gene network can stabilize so that gene damage remains constrained along with mortality of the organism, which may then enjoy a remarkable degree of stability over very long times. We clarify the relation between stress-resistance and aging and suggest that stabilization of the genetic network may provide a mathematical explanation of the Gompertz equation describing the relationship between age and mortality in many species, and of the apparently negligible senescence observed in exceptionally long-lived animals. The model may support a range of applications, such as systematic searches for therapeutics to extend lifespan and healthspan.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.