Paper detail

Stability analysis for cylindrical Couette flow of compressible fluids

A new analysis of basic Couette flow, is based on an Action Principle for compressible fluids, with a Hamiltonian as well as a kinetic potential. An effective criterion for stability recognizes the tensile strength of water. This interpretation relates the problem to capillary action and to metastable configurations (Berthelot's negative pressure experiment of 1850). We calculate the pressure and density profiles and find that the first instability of basic Couette flow is localized near the bubble point. This theoretical prediction has been confirmed by recent experiments. The theory is the result of merging the two versions of classical hydrodynamics, as advocated by Landau for superfluid Helium II, but here applied to fluids in general, in accord with a widely held opinion concerning superfluidity. In this paper two-flow dynamics is created by merging two actions, not by choosing between them, nor by combining the two vector fields as in the Navier-Stokes equation . At rest, as contributions to the mass flow they cancel, but a non-zero kinetic energy and kinetic potential as well as non-zero angular momentum remain, manifest as liquid tension, as is well known to exist by observation of the meniscus and configurations with negative pressure. (Fronsdal 2020b in preparation). This theory gives a very satisfactory characterization of the limit of stability of the most basic Couette flow. The inclusion of a vector field that is not a gradient has the additional affect of introducing spin, which explains a most perplexing experimental discovery: the ability of frozen Helium to remember its angular momentum.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.