Paper detail

SQuIGGLE: Studying Quenching in Intermediate-z Galaxies -- Gas, AnguLar Momentum, and Evolution

We describe the SQuIGGLE survey of intermediate-redshift post-starburst galaxies. We leverage the large sky coverage of the SDSS to select ~1300 recently-quenched galaxies at 0.5<z<~0.9 based on their unique spectral shapes. These bright, intermediate-redshift galaxies are ideal laboratories to study the physics responsible for the rapid quenching of star formation: they are distant enough to be useful analogs for high-redshift quenching galaxies, but low enough redshift that multi-wavelength follow-up observations are feasible with modest telescope investments. We use the Prospector code to infer the stellar population properties and non-parametric star formation histories of all galaxies in the sample. We find that SQuIGGLE galaxies are both very massive (M* ~ 10^11.25 Msun) and quenched, with inferred star formation rates <~1Msun/yr, more than an order of magnitude below the star-forming main sequence. The best-fit star formation histories confirm that these galaxies recently quenched a major burst of star formation: >75% of SQuIGGLE galaxies formed at least a quarter of their total stellar mass in the recent burst, which ended just ~200Myr before observation. We find that SQuIGGLE galaxies are on average younger and more burst-dominated than most other z<~1 post-starburst samples. This large sample of bright post-starburst galaxies at intermediate redshift opens a wide range of studies into the quenching process. In particular, the full SQuIGGLE survey will investigate the molecular gas reservoirs, morphologies, kinematics, resolved stellar populations, AGN incidence, and infrared properties of this unique sample of galaxies in order to place definitive constraints on the quenching process.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.