Paper detail

Splitting trees with neutral Poissonian mutations II: Largest and Oldest families

We consider a supercritical branching population, where individuals have i.i.d. lifetime durations (which are not necessarily exponentially distributed) and give birth (singly) at constant rate. We assume that individuals independently experience neutral mutations, at constant rate $θ$ during their lifetimes, under the infinite-alleles assumption: each mutation instantaneously confers a brand new type, called allele or haplotype, to its carrier. The type carried by a mother at the time when she gives birth is transmitted to the newborn. We are interested in the sizes and ages at time $t$ of the clonal families carrying the most abundant alleles or the oldest ones, as $t\to\infty$, on the survival event. Intuitively, the results must depend on how the mutation rate $θ$ and the Malthusian parameter $α>0$ compare. Hereafter, $N\equiv N_t$ is the population size at time $t$, constants $a,c$ are scaling constants, whereas $k,k'$ are explicit positive constants which depend on the parameters of the model. When $α>θ$, the most abundant families are also the oldest ones, they have size $cN^{1-θ/α}$ and age $t-a$. When $α<θ$, the oldest families have age $(α/θ)t+a$ and tight sizes; the most abundant families have sizes $k\log(N)-k'\log\log(N)+c$ and all have age $(θ-α)^{-1}\log(t)$. When $α=θ$, the oldest families have age $kt-k'\log(t)+a$ and tight sizes; the most abundant families have sizes $(k\log(N)-k'\log\log(N)+c)^2$ and all have age $t/2$. Those informal results can be stated rigorously in expectation. Relying heavily on the theory of coalescent point processes, we are also able, when $α\leqθ$, to show convergence in distribution of the joint, properly scaled ages and sizes of the most abundant/oldest families and to specify the limits as some explicit Cox processes.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.